Want access to post press releases? To sign up, use this form. You must be logged in.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT ...
End the charade on ethics panel
Editorial, Asbury Park Press, October 25, 2006
The unseemly behavior exhibited at Monday's legislative ethics panel meeting offered further evidence that such panels should consist of only public members. This particular panel should be disbanded and folded into the State Ethics Commission, as recommended nearly a year ago in an ethics reform study commissioned by then-acting Gov. Richard J. Codey.
The meeting was dominated by legislators who spent most of their time bickering along partisan lines, accomplishing next to nothing. It was the panel's first such meeting in 17 months. With the ethical lapses that seem to surface daily in Trenton, that alone is unconscionable. Then the panel spent four hours in a stalemate arguing over who would be chairman.
The voice of reason came from the public members. After noting that all but five minutes of the first two hours of discussion were monopolized by legislators, public member William Kersey said: "You've had the debates. You've had the name calling. You've had the arguments. You've had the back-and-forth - no member of the public has any input . . . you (legislators) need to get your acts together."
The panel of 16 - eight public members and eight legislators evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans - also spent a half hour debating, and ultimately rejecting, the minutes from the May 2005 meeting.
The Republicans objected to the chairmanship of Raymond Bramucci - a former state labor commissioner under Gov. James J. Florio - until he pledged to expeditiously handle more than 30 complaints filed by Bogota Mayor Steve Lonegan accusing lawmakers of steering state money to themselves, their families or politically connected firms.
If history is any guide, no action will be taken on the complaints. Only four lawmakers have been cited for ethical lapses in 32 years. And five ethics committee members are among the legislators named in the 30 complaints.
Because the legislative ethics panel has been dominated by legislators not willing to rat out their colleagues, it has been toothless since its inception. It should be merged into the seven-member State Ethics Commission that oversees state employees and the executive branch. That body has four public members and three executive branch employees. We would prefer that all seven of its members be public members. Gov. Corzine should take the lead in ensuring that complaints lodged against lawmakers are heard by a panel that will operate objectively and free of partisan considerations.
The GOP seems to be gearing up for a real Senate confirmation hearing if Governor Jon Corzine reappoints Barry Albin to the New Jersey Supreme ... >
It's hard to not be concerned these days. We've all witnessed frustration with our institutions before but I never remember anything of this ... >
Instead of borrowing trillions to waste on make-work governmental projects, stimulate the economy with tax cuts. >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
With the entrance of Chris Christie into the Republican gubernatorial primary, the GOP has greatly enhanced its chances of capturing the ... >
Hard to believe we have arrived at the last year of the first decade of the 21st century. Boy, seems like it was just yesterday that Bush was handed ... >
It's actually come to this: A panel convened by the legislature of the State of New Jersey has concluded that discrimination is not good. Maybe ... >
As it tends to, history seems to be repeating itself as 240 laid-off workers at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago revive a decades old tactic -- ... >
Many columnists write a "year in review" or a "predictions" piece for the New Year, however I decided to refrain from going down ... >
Five Democrat governors including New Jersey’s Jon Corzine and New York’s David Paterson have called upon the incoming Obama administration to ... >
Comments