The New York Times has a good story today on New Jersey surpassing Massachusetts as the most liberal state in America.
Just like Massachusetts, New Jersey hasn’t elected a Republican to the United States Senate since 1972. Only Hawaii and West Virginia have gone longer. And New Jersey has gone longer without electing a Republican to statewide office than any of the other 49 states; Christie Whitman was the last GOP statewide win, in 1997. But even so, it’s been fourteen years since a New Jersey Democrat has won re-election to any statewide office – the last one was Frank Lautenberg in 1994.
Marcellus Jackson, who resigned his seat as a Passaic City Councilman after admitting that he took $26,000 in bribes from an undercover FBI agent, ... >
The financial debacle on Wall Street may change many things. Our international power, standard of living and individual security might all ... >
Joe Biden promises to impose Catholic dogma upon the country, and calls it "patriotic". >
The NJ 101.5 radio debate scheduled later this month was one Frank Lautenberg quickly agreed to - in fact his campaign was the first to confirm its ... >
The sub prime mortgage melt down and its ensuing financial “crisis” has tested the mettle of all of us who believe in and support the free ... >
For the past few weeks, I've watched with fascination as politician after politician have appeared on a beach or a boardwalk and declared their ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
Senator John McCain insisted that he and Senator Barak Obama should go on the road for a host of town hall meetings to discuss the issues in a ... >
According to a Fairleigh Dickinson poll, Senator Frank Lautenberg leads Lobbyist Dick Zimmer by 16 points, 50-34 percent. Fourteen percent say ... >
While New Jersey suffered from a crippling structural deficit, politicians created a slush fund to dole out tax dollars for their own personal gain.
... >
As I drove home from a VP debate party on Thursday night, I surfed radio talk shows and heard countless callers say that Governor Palin ‘won’ the ... >
Selective
This article makes good points but neglects the fact the GOP managed to win in many towns last year where they had been dormant, that the one Senate seat net gain of Van Drew was not a liberal, the only Assembly Dem pickup (DeAngelo) is conservative, and that two referendums with liberal goals were soundly defeated.
And the Democrat leadership
And the Democrat leadership has done wonders for us, lol. When will the people of this state wakeup?
Pitching from the stretch
SewarenScoop -- ha ha ha. So you are suggesting that the Republicans losing every statewide election for more than a decade, losing control of the Senate and Assembly and having a minority House position is offset by a single Senate seat and some local offices?
That's not a scoop. It's a stretch.
We did so well in the 1990s
igotkavorka -- So the Republicans controlled Drumthwacket and both houses for eight years and did better? During the best economy the country had ever seen our taxes skyrocketed, our investment in infrastructure collapsed, our pension plan went to hell, our motor vehicle systems got worse, auto insurers fled the state while those who stayed kept increasing their rates, and let's not forget the Parsons and EasyPass debacles.
The state is a mess. i'm not going to deny that the Democrats have had a significant hand in it, because they have.
My point is that neither party has been good for the state. You may think one or the other was better, but they are both full of legislators who are too weak to do the tough work that needs to be done to fix the problems we face.
So please don't try to make this a partisan issue. There's more than enough evidence of incompetence on both sides.
Excellent point, Sewaren.
Liberal and Democrat are most definitely not the same thing.
The New York Times, our illustrious Governor, and anyone else neglects that at their own peril.
liberal policies, a Democratic future
Once we get past the barriers of the labeling of "liberal" for certain policies and simply realize that the ideals behind contemporary liberalism yield positive results for the state and country, then perhaps the larger sea change of progressive national politics will be furthered. Promoting a clean environment and preserving open space, sustaining economic benefits for small businesses and workers through unions and tax incentives/rebates, allowing individual freedoms through correcting the law when those freedoms are curtailed -- these aren't just the tenets of liberal utopianism but instead constitute some of the founding, core ideals of this country.
In N.J., besides abolishing the death penalty and getting close to a real family leave bill, I can't help but think that two further bills that should be considered would be: a straightforward marriage equality bill and an impeachment bill for both Bush and Cheney. I would imagine that the former is a more realistic option than the latter, but our state legislature should make up for Congress' inability to act on impeachment. At the least, the substantial legislative accomplishment of recent years, particularly the death penalty abolishment, should hypothetically create a domino effect for similar legislative and judicial action in other states, since this legislation is indeed the right, just and necessary thing to do.
Blah, blah, blah
If the Democratic Party mistakes its success as a mandate for unchecked liberal fiscal and social policy, it will spell the end of the party's majority. If it remains the moderate choice for New Jerseyans, its majority will continue.
Whether Finkelstein paints someone with the L-word is irrelevant.