U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg has never amassed huge approval numbers in public opinion polls, but he’s never lost an election either.
As he approached his first re-election campaign, Lautenberg was at a 36%-21% approval rating in a February 1988 Eagleton Institute poll; voters said they would re-elect Lautenberg over a Republican by a 37%-24% margin. In that race, Lautenberg defeated retired Army General Peter Dawkins by a 54%-46% margin.
Six years later, Lautenberg had a 39%-39% approval rating in a February 1994 Eagleton poll. Just 28% of the voters said they would support his re-election, while 49% suggested it was time for a new U.S. Senator. But by Election Day, Lautenberg defeated Assembly Speaker Garabed “Chuck” Haytaian, 50%-47%.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group that promotes ethics and accountability, has filed a complaint with the ... >
There's nothing more difficult to see than the history before your eyes. It sometimes takes generations to understand the significance of ... >
OK, he didn't say precisely that, but when the Chairman of the Budget Committee informs us that governmental spending is the key to prosperity, ... >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The media, which loves headlines and knows little history, is trying to sell President Elect Obama as another Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But that ... >
When I was eleven, way back in 1965, my family was invited for Thanksgiving to my cousins’ cousins, a Jewish-Italian family who lived in the ... >
After the entire Star-Ledger editorial board opted to accept the paper's buyout offer, John Farmer, a 26-year veteran of the paper, was tasked ... >
A couple of weeks ago, my mother, Angelina Katz, did her second debate on behalf of Barack Obama. A debate? My mother? If you knew her, you’d be ... >
A rained out MusicFest this past September has provided Union County with $275,000 in insurance monies. The Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders ... >
Today the Asinine Watch begins. With so many illiterate statements made about the economy by elected officials in recent days and weeks, it was ... >
bland is good
However, I would also submit that some of those candidates he faced weren't the greatest. If Lautenberg had been challenged by Bob Franks, he probably would have lost.
Generally, it seems Frank Lautenberg's greatest asset is that he doesn't piss anyone off. He's pretty bland, and at the end of the day, that may be enough in Blue Jersey.
Frank is on borrowed time
Lautenberg historically has never been a big vote-getter because he lacks a regional base. He'll need to explain his Millicent Fenwick comments this time on the trail and he will face a Republican that will be young enough to be his son. It's time to retire, again. The Democrats have some great candidates and there is no need for this man to risk the seat with only 48 Democrats (excluding Lieberman & Sanders).
The Dawkins campaign ...
was the only contest I ever walked out on after commiting my support. He was a golden boy on paper - college football hero, Army General, etc. - but he was a basket case as a candidate. He never successfully defined himself on certain core issues and when he tried to do so, he came off as an equivocating empty suit. As they say in boxing, styles make fights. Lautenberg's opponents have certainly been favorable to him in this sense.