Roselle Park felt a little bit like Des Moines last night, when about 200 Democrats gathered at an Italian restaurant for the New Jersey Democratic Caucus, where the results didn’t mean much but Democratic passion was on full display.
But if the results actually held water, then the world of New Jersey politics is topsy-turvy, because Hillary Clinton – who continues to lead state polls by 30% margins -- was eliminated in the first round of caucusing, coming in short of the 15% threshold with 27 members – 6 less than Dennis Kucinich’s 33.
And ultimately John Edwards, who barely makes a dent in New Jersey polls, prevailed with 76 supporters to Barack Obama’s 68 and Kucinich’s 34.
The event was conceived and organized by Jeff Gardner, co-chair of New Jersey for Democracy, and John Bartlett, Chairman of the Executive Committee of New Jersey’s Democratic Future. Gardner had seen the Iowa caucuses four years ago, and thought it would be fun to imitate. The two organizers invited every candidate – except one.
“We didn’t invite Mike Gravel because we didn’t know how to find him,” said Gardner Alaska. Only one other candidate, Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd, did not send a surrogate.
But while Dennis Kucinich isn’t likely to come in third place on election day, Bartlett thought that the caucus results had some significance.
“The folks in this room are not the people who max out campaign contributions, but they’re maxing out in shoe leather,” he said.
Even so, the party’s establishment was out in full force tonight. Assemblyman/Democratic State Committee Chairman Joe Cryan introduced Assemblywoman Linda Stender, who’s running for congress here in the seventh district.
“The reason I haven’t endorsed is because I am going to be proud to run with whoever the Democratic candidate is, and I know that we’re all going to work together at the end of the day to make sure we elect a Democratic president and a Democratic congress,” said Stender.
Senate President Dick Codey showed up to give a quick speech in support of Edwards, citing his blue collar background.
“He will always understand that the mill worker in Robbins, NC deserves as much of a voice as the millionaire in Short Hills,” said Codey.
Assembly Majority Leader Bonnie Watson-Coleman pinch hit for Clinton, saying that a candidate who’s undergone as much scrutiny as she has is not unelectable.
“In my book she is the most electable Democratic candidate running for president – she is the tested candidate – she is the most vetted candidate – we’ve been in her bedroom and she’s still standing.”
U.S. Rep. Steve Rothman was there for Obama, touting his candidate as having the best chance of beating a Republican. But he got a few boos after saying that nominating any other candidate could lead to congressional losses. (Rothman got a similar reaction after taking a swipe Hillary Clinton at the Democratic State Convention in September).
“We want the Democrat who can win – does it makes any sense to nominate someone who already half of the country’s voters’ say they don’t like or don’t support? Does that make sense for the Democratic Party? No,” said Rothman to laughter from Clinton supporters.
The lesser-known candidates got lesser-known names: Bradley Beach Councilwoman Julie Schreck stood for Kucinich, who had a surprisingly strong showing. She touted him as the most anti-war candidate, and the only one willing to undertake real reforms.
“When Warren Buffet was telling people that our nation’s income tax system is generous to him, we know we have a problem. Only Dennis Kucinich has the independence, courage and integrity to eliminate waste from our bloated,” said Schrek.
Joe Biden’s state director, Larry Stempler, said that his candidate had a deeper understanding of foreign affairs than any of the others, and noted that Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf called him to discuss that country’s political situation – before reaching out to President Bush.
“Musharraf actually called Joe Biden before he talked to anyone in this administration. That’s a sad, sad commentary of what we have today, but it also shows the respect that he has in this world,” said Stempler.
Bill Richardson, who only had six supporters in the first round, was represented by his New York City director Allison Tupper, who gave the most policy-oriented speech of the bunch.
“We were getting petitions signed in New York and we talked to an awful lot of Republicans who said ‘No, I can’t sign your petition I’m a Republican, but he’s the one for me.”
After Clinton failed to make the first cut, having fallen short of the 15% threshold, her supporters shrugged the loss off as insignificant.
“She has the support of 19 of 21 county chairs,” said Al Komjathy, a lobbyist from Lambertville. “We could have brought in a bus of Clinton supporters.”
Lobbyist/cable TV host Jim McQueeny is strongly denying an Inside Edge report that he was one of three people who worked on a plan for U.S. ... >
One hesitates to quote Shakespeare to the Editors of The Record. The thought of all that dust rising from their library shelves is enough to make me ... >
NJ STARS, while failing in its intended purpose, nonetheless demonstrates the need for fundamental reform in NJ's high schools. >
It’s not often a congressional seat opens up in New Jersey – so you would think that all editorial eyes would be focused on any and all ... >
“Capitalism is responsible for the current food crisis and starvation around the world,” the voice on the radio said. “Attend our Introduction ... >
For the past few weeks, I've watched with fascination as politician after politician have appeared on a beach or a boardwalk and declared their ... >
I’m off through July 23 for some much needed rest and relaxation. I'll be heading up to Niagara Falls and Buffalo, and then down to wine ... >
As the presidential race heats up, both parties are looking at so called swing voters, those who have in the past gone from one party to another ... >
As labor is burning, our National union leaders are fiddling. Some of them are simply arsonists. While the labor movement has made tremendous ... >
Bear with me here...at least I'm not proposing something patently ridiculous like self-serve gas stations!
It's true that rising energy ... >
Edwards victories, the Democratic establishment
For quite some time, I've been arguing that the support that Clinton engenders among the N.J. Democratic establishment, particularly among such luminaries and influential politicians as Gov. Corzine and Sen. Menendez, is not unilaterally shared amongst progressive activists and supporters across the state. This Edwards victory, with Obama coming in a close second, is further confirmation of the schism between the Democratic establishment's support of Clinton and the activist's support of Edwards, Obama and, to a lesser extent, Kucinich.
Edwards has won 10 Blue Jersey straw polls in a row, has won the mock presidential caucus last night, and has an impressive amount of endorsements in the state in his own right (Panter, Scutari, Sweeney, Codey). New Jersey Democrats who are possibly supporting Clinton because of name recognition and geographical correlation should rethink their affiliation; Edwards, Richardson and Biden all present powerful, policy-driven arguments for their respective candidacies, though Edwards' vision on health care, global warming, poverty relief, and other issues is more far-reaching and focused than any other Democratic candidate.
There are several reasons why Edwards' policies are best suited in particular to New Jersey voters and their middle-class tax relief and environmental emphasis, some of which I outline in the published letter to the editor below:
http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071205/OPINION/712050329/1047
Finally, Blue Jersey has a nice pic of Matt in action at last night's caucus before sending his article out this morning:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bluejersey/2093789123/
Progressives vs. the Establishment
The difference between the party establishment and progressive activists is the division between those who see politics as some kind of club, or a cult of personality-- they're the one's salivating over politicsNJ's "Power List"-- and the people who actually imagine achieving some sort of goals through political action.
Edwards house
Johnny Edwards has a 28,200 square feet house with 102 acre backyard.
How much would his property taxes be per year if he lived in New Jersey???????
It would cost him alot.
It would cost him alot. But you can get cheaper haircuts here.
Who really like Hillary?
I mean, when are the Corzine's of the world going to understand that Clinton's support is an inch thick and mile wide?
The woman is not Bill, and she never will be.
What she is nothing but a cold & calculating liberal snob who believes she should be coronated with the nomination because that's the payoff for staying loyal to her filandering husband.
The so-called "money people" and insiders promoting this political stiff don't get and never will. All they see is dollar signs and political access to the White House.
It's not going to happen.
Hillary support falling in the progressive community
After Clinton failed to make the first cut, having fallen short of the 15% threshold, her supporters shrugged the loss off as insignificant. “She has the support of 19 of 21 county chairs,” said Al Komjathy, a lobbyist from Lambertville. “We could have brought in a bus of Clinton supporters.” Komjathy sort of misses the point here. Yes, they could have brought in a bus of Clinton supporter. But they didn't. Instead, they chose not to. That's telling. Karen Kominsky and other NJ Hillary staffers were there, but the numbers for her were not. Other campaigns brought their heavy hitters ---Senator Codey for Edwards; Rep. Steve Rothman for Obama---and they brought their progressive support. The Hillary people did not. Hillary does not have the support of the progressive community for a variety of reasons. The way the Hillary people approached this caucus was smug and superior. Combine this with her slipping away of support in Iowa, it's a new ballgame in NJ, too.
Bottom Lines...
Any of the Democrats running will be far better than any of the Republicans.
My own preference is Edwards, though I'm more in accord with Kucinich's views.
All indications, so far, are that Edwards would do best running against any of the Republicans.
Having said that, I would still work hard to elect Clinton if she is the nominee; and I am sure the same is true of Steve Rothman and of the whole Democratic community nationwide.
Hillary has her obvious flaws and faults; she's not perfect. However compared to any one of her potential Republican rivals, she's an angel.
Meanwhile, Edwards may yet surprise us all!
From Frederick Douglass