August 16, 2007 - 1:33pm

Lautenberg's poll numbers are awful, but does it really matter?

The Rutgers-Eagleton poll has confirmed what Quinnipiac University said last month: New Jerseyans aren't sure they want Frank Lautenberg representing them in the United States Senate until he is ninety years old.  Lautenberg, who became the oldest New Jerseyan to win a statewide election when he defeated Republican Douglas Forrester by ten perentage points in 2002, is expected to seek re-election to a fifth term next year -- when he is 84-years-old.  His Eagleton re-elect numbers are horrible -- 61% say its time for a change -- but New Jersey Democrats aren't exactly in a panic over a U.S. Senate seat the Republicans have not won since 1972.

So far, Republicans have been careful not to acknowledge that Lautenberg's age is the underlying issue in the '08 Senate race -- they say the contest will be about Lautenberg's record.  But some pundits say that Lautenberg's votes are not necessarily out of step with the majority of New Jerseyans, and that age is his true achilles heal.   Still, Lautenberg has several tremendous assets: a history of weak poll numbers that don't seem to jeopardize his electoral success, a hefty campaign warchest, a national political climate that seems to favor Democrats (and a political landscape in Blue Jersey where onetime Republican strongholds like Burlington, Atlantic, Monmouth and even Somerset are tending Democratic), and a lack of top tier Republican contenders.  

Comments

Lautenberg is sooooo beatable.


It is always amazing that candidates do not attempt to move up (only one sitting member from the legislature ran for governor in 2005, and 2001, and 1997.)  We have six GOP congressmen and none of them want to try for Senator? And several Democratic Congressmen have money enough to begin a primary challenge, but no one moves.  Give credit to Tom Kean, Jr: at least he had the guts to run.

08/16/07 2:00 pm

Presidential Year


As bad as his numbers are - it's NJ in a Presidential year... no way.

08/16/07 2:19 pm

Re: Lautenberg is so beatable


Every political report that I've seen has Lautenberg as a "Safe Dem," not a "likely Dem," but the highest degree of probability possible for an incumbent senator. Usually, Democratic congressmen don't one-up an incumbent and run against him, as is the case with the Republicans, too.

I'm equally astounded that anyone with any political realism would vote that Murphy, Christie or Lonegan could beat Corzine, just as much as I'm shocked that anyone thinks that a conservative such as Pennacchio or Estabrook could beat Lautenberg. By any objective standard, these are dark, dark times for the New Jersey Republican Party -- and for the national party.

08/16/07 2:47 pm

Intellectual Honesty...


Martin, Do you think Democrats EVER can lose or are EVER wrong? Next you'll be saying Democrats can win the 24th District! As for OnoUK, I think it is time for one of our good Republican congressman runs for Governor or Senator or something. Most of these districts would stay in GOP hands. I do think that the Democrats will be turning to Rob Andrews at some point, as he is a much stronger candidate for them than Lautenberg.

08/16/07 3:48 pm

with the right candidates


The Democrats can win any district in NJ. The same goes for the Republican party. Sure, a Democrat winning in LD 24 is hard to envision, but it isn't out of the realm of possibility with the right candidate.

08/16/07 4:00 pm

it doesn't matter


Until the GOP actually elects a Senator in my lifetime, all this talk about whether or not The Crypt Keeper is vulnerable is blather.

Sorry to say, Dan, Marty's right. Sen. Fossil is rated as "safe Dem" primarily due to the virtually non-existent bench of the NJGOP. Neither potential candidate on the GOP side has a prayer.

Even if Rudy is the nominee and brings the state into play, it means nothing if history is any indicator. In 1988, Bush 41 carried the state and The Crypt Keeper was reelected. In 1984, Reagan and Bradley won.

BTW, if a Democrat were to win LD24, there would be about two GOP senators left.

08/16/07 9:22 pm