Democratic Senate challenger Rep. Rob Andrews continues to hit his primary opponent, Frank Lautenberg, for not yet agreeing to an aggressive debate schedule.
But Lautenberg’s campaign countered that they’re trying to fit a debate schedule in with Senate business, noting that Andrews has spent his time campaigning instead of casting votes in the House.
Andrews has even gone so far as to set up a hotline to keep track of the “missing Senator,” and said that he’s heard mixed messages from the Senator and his campaign staff about whether he will participate in debates.
"Effective today we are encouraging all New Jersey Democrats to call and email us if they find Senator Lautenberg and tell us what his latest excuse is on why he won’t debate Congressman Andrews,” said an Andrews press release.
In a conference call with reporters today, Andrews reiterated that he’s accepted 11 debate invitations from press organizations across the state, noting that Lautenberg has not yet agreed to any.
Andrews brought up Lautenberg’s first Senate campaign against Republican Millicent Fenwick in 1982. Lautenberg had challenged Fenwick to 21 debates – one in each of the state’s counties. Fenwick agreed to participate in five.
“He said that five wasn’t enough in 1982 when he accused Millicent Fenwick of not being energetic enough to represent people in the state.” said Andrews. “The Senator was right in 1982, and he should follow his own advice in 2008, and he should debate. I don’t take anyone’s vote for granted.”
Lautenberg spokeswoman Julie Roginsky said that Andrews’s campaigning has caused him to miss a week’s worth of votes in Congress. The reason that the Lautenberg campaign has not yet committed to debates, she said, is that they’re working around the Senate’s schedule.
“I’m not debating debates for him,” she said. “We’re in the process of working out debates right now, but I would advise him to remember that we have a Senate schedule to keep to…. which Rep. Andrews doesn’t seem to think is a priority since he’s skipped a week’s worth of votes so far.”
Andrews missed 19 votes in the House last week, and has not cast a vote since April 17th. Since April 1st, Andrews has missed 32 votes. Over the same time period, Lautenberg has missed six.
“Over an 18 year career in the House Andrews has among the best voting records," said Andrews Campaign Chairman Michael Murphy. "I expect the Lautenberg camp will want to get bogged down in the details. Rob made it clear that he will go anywhere, whatever the format, whoever the moderator is.”
Andrews is heading down to Washington on Wednesday for important votes.
Andrews himself has frequently cited his own “energy” in his stump speeches, contrasting that to what he says it the 84-year-old incumbent’s “tired, stale, old status quo politics.” But when asked by a reporter whether he was bringing up the term to remind voters of Lautenberg’s age, Andrews said that the voters will decide whether it’s an important factor.
“The voters are going to have to answer that question, not me. And part of the way they’ll answer that question is to see whether people debate, what they’ll stand for,” he said.
Andrews listed a number of issues he’d like the opportunity to debate Lautenberg on, including the high price of gasoline, the Iraq War and health care. He would be happy with a minimum of seven debates.
Lautenberg actually addressed the oil cost issue in the Democratic Party’s weekly radio address on Saturday, blaming “big oil,” speculators and Republicans for the high price of gas. But Andrews said it wasn’t enough.
“The Senator gave a speech on Saturday – that’s very nice,” he said. “That’s not going to do anything for the people who are outraged about paying $4.00 a gallon for gasoline.”
Andrews said that part of the problem springs from the domination of refiners in specific markets, noting that Sun Oil Co. supplies 2/3 of the gasoline for the south Jersey market. He said that one way to address the issue is to work hard to get a Democratic administration in the White House.
Joe Ferriero's recent legal woes -- allegations that he assaulted a woman at a Labor Day barbecue at his home, and a federal probe of a grants ... >
There's something missing from the Republican Convention. There is a need for a camera behind the curtain where speakers greet ... >
Barack Obama offers a hard-left vision for America. He would take NJ's disastrous economic policies national, and the resulting economic ... >
Selecting the next NJN anchor will certainly be a different process than what happens at the major networks, local affiliates and other public ... >
Tibet – the broad, high plateau between India and China – is bigger than Western Europe and the source of the great rivers of Asia: the Indus, ... >
For the past few weeks, I've watched with fascination as politician after politician have appeared on a beach or a boardwalk and declared their ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on Meet the Press, made a statement that incurred the wrath of members of the Catholic bishops club. She dared to say that ... >
And now we go back in time, to Mr. Dembo's eighth grade science class and JHS 278, and a sixteen millimeter film about the seasonal migration of ... >
Missing candidate.
He's not a missing Senator, since he's actively voting in the Senate.
Andrews, however, appears to be a missing Representative.
It's enough already with the ducking.
There are a little more than four weeks left in the primary. This is a blatant attempt to run down the clock because you don't want people to see that you can no longer string together a coherent sentence without falling asleep, drooling and changing your Depends.
Boo.
This race is bo-ring.
It's been going on for a couple of weeks and most of the people who know there's some sort of primary coming don't know it's contested.
So can Rob Andrews just lose already?
weak argument
I dont understand what Andrews argument is. He wants to debate FL about the price of oil and what FL isnt doing? But Andrews is already an elected representative and has the ability to introduce legislation. it sounds like instead of actually DOING something he wants to talk about it and debate it 11 times. Futhermore, Andrews is missing a lot of votes. While they probably aren't all that important, it weakens his argument that we need an energetic and involved Senator, FL is showing up more often than Andrews is and as we all know, showing up is half the battle.
it's unfortunate that Andrews, who had so much potential, is coming across so poorly of late. he's wasting his talents on a primary and campaigning when he should be backing up his talking points by being effective in washington.
They must debate
A debate is the only true way to show the actual differences between the two candidates. If we can't see them together, how can we vote for either one of them? We can't see their differences and make an educated decision.
Lautenberg needs to get out in front and debate. He says that he will run on his record but so it seems his campaign is acutally running on Andrews' record. Without a debate, we cannot see the differences. Lautenberg needs to engage in a debate and tell NJ residents that his record is better than Andrews'.
If Lautenberg is afraid of losing a debate, how can he justify representing us in Washington? US Senate's not an easy job - neither are debates. He needs to do his job and prove to NJ residents that they elected a US Senator who is strong and effective. The only way he can do that is debate.
Dana Redd.
It's becoming clearer that SJ is getting rid of an ineffective congressman. It is a pleasure to observe such foward thinking officials from Camden County. Maybe Dana Redd will be the choice to represent the congressional district. Age is not the illiminating factor from a position of power. Case closed.
not true
the only way he can prove he's been a good and effective senator is to debate? how about you just look at his record, look at what he's done for transportation to the state, have the forward thinking to close gun show loopholes and other issues he's taken a strong stance on.
and look at andrews record. he wants to say that we need to look to the future and not the past when it comes to his record. but i dont want a us senator who helped craft the iraq resolution. it shows that he's capable of making mistakes and not having the courage to stand up for the right thing no matter how politically unpopular it is.