Sabrin on filing day

It's that scarf which makes Murray!

I like what the man has to say. I look forward to hearing more at the debate.

It's nice to hear the words out of the candidates mouth. Lets hope there is more to come.

I think the is a race between Murray and Joe. Who else is left. The GOP has asked just about everybody else.

Anyway lets see more of this.

I find it hysterically funny that Murray Sabrin suddenly wants to stick to the issues and debate the issues when he has spent the last 2 months absolutely smearing his opponents.  The guy operates like a Clinton, has run as a liberatarian and now proclaims to be an issues candidate.  Funny stuff, especially the scarf!

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have.” - Thomas Jefferson

You ask for you issues..

He gives you the issues...

And all some of you do is bash him for bashing other...

hypocrites...

I think some of you would post negative on any bit of news. All anybody said was it was a good interview. Lets try posting on this specific bit of news with out the same old tired rhetoric.

I would love to hear all the candidates issues. Lets hope there is a debate soon.

I think that would be best. I can make up my mind after I hear them speak. I dont care much for the he said she said nonsense.

The press has to sell papers... I just what to know who I'm voting...

Lets have more of this type of reporting
politicker.

What else can I say. Unless, I get a free can of Goya beans from Andy, I am going to stick with Dr. Sabrin. Finally, somebody who can put two sentences together and make sense. To my surprise, he did not mention Ronald Reagan at all like some other candidates do all the time.

On the other hand, I would like to discuss the issue of creating a nationalist party in NJ. In light of some actions taken by the back to the USSR Chairmen, I think we need a strong Leader, who could reign them in like Jersey Joke for example. The first order would be to buss them in to a military base for a reeducation camp for a month. Some of them would need the boot camp anyway to loose some fat.

While you are at it, put Andrews and Frankie on the bus as well.

How is it different? Explain.

When commentators on PolitickerNJ say that Sabrin is campaigning dirty or negatively, this does not really affect the race. Most voters do not read this website and therefore do not care about who releases press releases. When Sabrin debates he will be able to hit any question out of the park and voters will see that. There needs to be a debate. 

I do not work for the campaign but my theory is this:

The leadership of Ron Paul 2008 has been heavily criticized for several decisions. Sabrin for Senate's goal is to win the election because the country is in an economic crisis thus it'd be good to have a PhD in Economic Geography and Finance Professor in the U.S. Senate.

Furthermore, Ron Paul supporters including Murray have been broadly insulted unjustly and ridiculed by people like Rudy Giuliani, who Andy Unanue donated money to. However, the 9/11 Commission Report, the CIA and the former lead CIA Agent hunting Bin Laden, the 9/11 Families and First Responders and every legitimate book on foreign policy and blowback agree with Ron Paul and not Rudy.

Ron Paul has been called "crazy" by MSNBC reporters such as Joe Scarborough yet don't even imply Clinton's spokesman has angry issues or good bye TV-show.

You can see the problem of Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalist Republicans (neocons, Big Gov Repubs) in this article by the Washington Times -

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080319/NATION/231391516

If you don't attack, especially respond swiftly to attacks, you will lose the game of politics. The Karl Rove strategy is requisite on both sides of the aisle and in times of great need, I support anyone who stands up for real money policy and truth.

A Clintonian Libertarian is a dream come true. This has nothing to do with political correctness. It has to do with a serious and looming problem the nation has and who is best to fix it.

The debate is only over what causes inflation, which is a silent tax that increases the cost of energy and food and steals the wealth from the middle class. The monetarists like the late Milton Friedman believe inflation is caused by increasing the money supply (new credit, low interest rates, etc).

Keynesians believe in priming the pump, increasing the money supply and that demand is more important relative to inflation then say printing several TRILLION in new money. (think of issuing new shares in a corporation and the resulting dilution is stock price.)

Remember, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Reece was once the Chairman of the RNC and if he were alive today I'm confident he'd be supporting Sabrin. 60 years ago he investigated the foreign policy establishment and exposed the State Department infiltration by the Federal Reserve Corporation shareholders/interests in order to incite war and enage in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Keynesianism.

The Republican party has great ideals and Dr. Murray Sabrin will bring them back to the GOP in the tradition of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan (before he was President).

If you want to see conclusive evidence that the Federal Reserve Corporation owners and interests have infiltrated the State Department to start wars watch the Reece Commission investigator Norman Dodd on video -

http://unitedelite.net/dodd.wmv

It was the first President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Nicholas Murray Butler, who first came up with the idea that through war we can change the world and thus implement what HG Wells called "the Open Conspiracy". A well known, noble intent for rich idealists to restructure the world's governments to end war through Fabian socialism. This is well documented in the Carnegie Archvies at Columbia Unviersity and in the Library of Congress.

Voting for anyone but Murray Sabrin in the NJ Republican primary is a vote for the political agenda of the private Federal Reserve.

Remember the CFR's headquarters in NYC is a former Standard Oil Executive's residence and the CFR Think Tank is called the David Rockefeller Studies Program. David of course is the heir to Standard/Exxon Mobil etc, a Fabian socialist and a shareholder in JP Morgan and thus a shareholder in the Federal Reserve Corporation.

A Message from the RNC Chairman (1946-1948), documented in the the East Tennessee University Archives of Appalachia and the Library of Congress -

http://www.etsu.edu/cass/Archives/Collections/afindaid/a3.html#IIIL

"Miss Casey's report (Hearing pp. 877 et seq.) shows clearly the interlock between The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and some of its associated organizations, such as the Council on Foreign Relations and other foundations, with the State Department. Indeed, these foundations and organizations would not dream of denying this interlock. They proudly note it in reports. They have undertaken vital research projects for the Department; virtually created minor departments or groups within the Department for it; supplied advisors and executives from their ranks; fed a constant stream of personnel into the State Department trained by themselves or under programs which they have financed; and have had much to do with the formation of foreign policy both in principle and detail."

"They have, to a marked degree, acted as direct agents of the State Department. And they have engaged actively, and with the expenditure of enormous sums, in propagandizing ('educating') public opinion in support of the policies which they have helped to formulate....What we see here is a number of large foundations, primarily The Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, using their enormous public funds to finance a one-sided approach to foreign policy and to promote it actively, among the public by propaganda, and in the Government through infiltration. The power to do this comes out of the power of the vast funds employed."

The great thing about a politician is they are supposed to listen to their constistuents. So please contact Sabrin for Senate and share your sentiments. I agree, I don't like the hardcore attacks but if my house is on fire I'm not going to care about the personalities of the firemen -- just that they have the solution to save my house.

If you can disprove the information I posted about the foreign policy establishment, please do because maybe there's another side to the story. And be aware that the CFR has publicly stated they want to abolish the dollar because "national currencies and global markets do not mix". It's the well known 6-step economic integration from former World Bank economist Bela Balassa. Doesn't that concern you?

As others pointed out, the voting populace is largely unaware of Sabrin's attacks. So let's get Sabrin for Senate to focus on the issues and not the attacks. The candidates for the race have been decided.

Let's schedule the debate between the 3 of them and find out who is most qualified to voice the concerns of New Jersey and the Nation as a whole in the U.S. Senate.

Agree?

Political ideology is completely irrelevant to the point that I'm illustraing here which is the same point I've been making on this site and my own blog for a long time now in reference to tactical political methods.

You can have the greatest political message and/or agenda in the world but if you don't know what it takes to win from a tactical standpoint, you're not going to get anywhere.

Barack Obama is the perfect example of what proper tactical political strategy is all about. He has done absolutely nothing but blow smoke up people's butts for for over a year now on the campaign trail but he's an excellent campain tactician who surrounds himself with the right people due in large part because he's a product of a well oiled, Chicago/Daley/Cook County Democrat machine that has taught him very well what it takes to win.

Remember too that Ronald Reagan was an idealist, not an ideologue who also knew that in order to beat Democrats, you had to use their own tactics against them and beat them at their own game.

"Political correctness is tyranny with manners." - Charlton Heston

Murray's PhD is in economic geography...not economics.  Look at what wikipedia has to say about economic geography (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_geography)  "Economic geography is the study of the location, distribution and spatial organization of economic activities across the Earth...Economic geography is usually regarded as a subfield of the discipline of geography"  This guy is no economist...he's a geographer and apparently prone to exaggerating his credentials.

Murray's master's is from Lehman College (a CUNY outpost in the Bronx) and his undergrad is from Hunter College (another CUNY outpost whose "campus" is 4 bldgs on Park Ave in Manhattan!  Funny how a guy who believes government does and spends too much went only to schools that were owned and funded by government!)  Apparently Murray is so embarrased by that he doesn't list Hunter  on his own website, you have to go look him up at his government job at Ramapo to find that out.

He may, from time to time, have some interesting to say, but it's really hard to take his "proper role of government" schtick seriously when the hypocrit draws his paycheck from the taxpayers.

To suggest Murray knows more about cartography than economics is illustrative of the fact that you know little about him or economics.

If you are correct, then Krugman (professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton) must too be a lowly ol' map maker.

Geographic economics has a lot to with economic integration and globalization. And what is the biggest issue today? Plus it is directly related to foreign policy.

BTW, Jersey Joe is a DENTIST. Murray has a PhD in Economy Geography (and I've know this all along, just shortened it for simplisticity).

PLEASE post something on Jersey Joe or Andy Unanue that suggests even 1% of what this does about Dr. Murray Sabrin.

Murray is the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR of the Center for Business and Public Policy at Ramapo. The following is the board of advisors. Remember you are like those you surround yourself:

Mr. Birger Brinck-Lund, president, New Enterprise Development, LLC, New Providence [Bio]

Mr. Dwight Carey, president, American Productivity Group, LLC, Fairfield [Bio]

Stephen C. Daffron, managing director, Citigroup [Bio]

Dr. Alieta Eck, family physician [Bio]

Mr. Gene Epstein, economics editor, Barron's [Bio]

Mr. Bob Franks, President, HealthCare Institute of New Jersey, former member of Congress [Bio]

Mr. Richard Garcia, Regional Vice President, Director of Community Lending, Hudson United Bank [Bio]

Congressman Scott Garrett [Bio]

Ilene B. Greene, President, MarketShare Communications, Inc. [Bio]

State Senator Leonard Lance [Bio]

Dr. Murray Sabrin, Executive Director, Professor of Finance, Ramapo College School of Administration and Business [Bio]

Dr. Joseph Salerno, professor of economics, Pace University, director of MBA Economics program [Bio]

Joan M. Wright, president, The Wright Perspective, Inc. [Bio]

Who are you supporting?

Why don't you assist the Sabrin Campaign on who to hire and what to do?

I always assumed the game was played by playing the game.  In otherwords, if I was Ron Paul 2008 I would of hired RNC/GOP insiders, people who have won campaign and heck even Karl Rove.

To suggest I have "know idea" what I'm talking about is a little presumptive.  My close friend was instrumental in electing Rudy Giuliani and he worked for years in his administration as a result.  He ran one of the largest political groups in NYC and has taught me a little of his knowledge.

But by all means, elucidate how to play the game -- please.

It seems like the way to win a campaign is to be rich or have rich friends.  So a big campaign budget is priority #1.  I'm on it.

Best guess is Sabrin is trying to avoid being ignored. Talking loud, while some will complain about, will often lead to discussion.

Playing nice when the party bosses want to ignore you is not effective.

And since many of the GOP rank and file have no love for the party bosses that keep serving up pro-choice, pro-tax, pro-spend, pro-illegal immigration, anti 2nd amendment liberals with cash, Dr. Sabrin's press releases are not commuicating what we didn't already know.

It's time to debate. No matter who your candidate is, or what one thinks about the other candidates, the GOP voters need to see a debate with all the candidates.

If the GOP avoids the debate issue, then the rank and file have to wonder why.

FYI: Its "you have NO clue" btw.