July 14, 2008 - 5:43pm

Pascrell and Pallone to unveil regulations for federal monitors' process

U.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-8), right, (with U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg).: Politicker photoU.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-8), right, (with U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg).: Politicker photo 

Two New Jersey congressmen intend to announce tomorrow their plans for legislation to regulate how U.S. attorneys award federal monitoring contracts.

Their Washington, D.C. news conference comes as part of the fallout from U.S. Attorney Chris Christie’s having awarded his former boss, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, a federal monitoring contract in which Ashcroft could make up to $52 million.

As part of their investigation, U.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-8) and U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone (D-6) requested full disclosure of 85 deferred and non-prosecution agreements and lists of corporate monitors selected in 41 agreements.

According to Pascrell’s office, the Justice Department shared some of the information with Congress earlier this year, "but details of several other agreements remain outstanding."

From the start of their Congressional inquiry into the monitoring process, which included a House Judiciary Committee grilling of Ashcroft earlier this year, Christie maintained that he followed a legal and ethical process.

But Pascrell and Pallone want to unveil their nuts and bolts solution to what they see as a conflict of interest, using some of the basic principles Pascrell laid out last year.

Although he has not declared himself a candidate, Christie, among his party peers, is the Republican frontrunner for the office of governor.

Comments

Now that the important work is done...


... maybe Congress will get around to dealing with such pedestrian issues as the solvency of Social Security and Medicare or actually solving the spiraling domestic energy problems... who knew how much the citizenry had to be protected from the evils of Justice Department monitoring agreements... how about protection from specious legislation from these bananas in Washington?... maybe after they deal with flag burning, prayer in school, gay marriage, and abortion they'll get around to dealing with issues of true importance...

07/14/08 7:45 pm

I couldn't have said it any better


myself.  Congress disgusts me so much. 

07/14/08 11:49 pm

Pure Politics


View From Morris County

What a stunner that two NJ Democratic Congressman would be looking to take a shot at the US Attorney. Truly amazing....

07/15/08 7:19 am

cc stern AND umdnj, ashcroft..includes but not limited to.


If there is a political aspect to this legislation, well too freakin' bad. Why should a CEO of a company and the people working for him(giving kickbacks) be treated differently than other criminals? If the CEO and CFO sign an agreement to not do this again for 18 months, then the company pays a fine and they are not charged with a crime? To add insult to our intelligence the person chosen to monitor this agreement is a political hack who just happens to be the former boss of the the appointing person. What's more political than that? Please go to the US Attorney's home page, read the DP agreement and decide if the monitor should get $10 million let alone $52 million. At the heart of America, no one should get railroaded and no one should go free because of privilege. Case closed.

07/15/08 9:34 am