Republican Assemblyman Richard Merkt took Gov. Jon Corzine to task today for repealing part of the contract he negotiated with a state labor union.
Originally, the contract with Communications Workers of America called for retired state workers to pay 1.5 percent of their pensions towards health care. This aspect of the contract met with opposition from some union members, who complained that teachers had better terms. Now, workers just need to sign up to take part in a “wellness program” or regular doctor visits and health education, and then upon retirement will not have to pay anything towards health coverage.
“Governor Corzine, under no pressure to change a contract already ratified, and set to take effect, has given up millions in savings for the state taxpayers. The question is: Why would he do this?,” asked Merkt.
But the question was rhetorical.
“The only credible explanation for changing the terms of an already approved contract is to curry favor with unions in an election year,” read Merkt’s statement.
Corzine’s office did not respond directly to Merkt’s comments, but pointed to the Governor’s statements at a press conference yesterday in which he said that the state would have only made about $2 million from the co-pays over the course of four years. The “wellness program,” Corzine said, could potentially save the state much more.
“I don't think it's a meaningful change in the scope of things,” said Corzine.
Absent from Merkt’s remarks was any reference to CWA leader and ex-Corzine flame Carla Katz. GOP State Chairman Tom Wilson has been assailing Corzine over the relationship, going as far as to file a lawsuit calling for the release of emails between the two from private accounts during the period that they negotiated the contract.
Through the window of Johnny Rockets in Denver, Gov. Jon Corzine can be seen getting down to “Staying Alive” on Wednesday night. >
One hesitates to quote Shakespeare to the Editors of The Record. The thought of all that dust rising from their library shelves is enough to make me ... >
A Post columnist contends that New Jersey offers a cautionary tale to New York. He's right. >
Selecting the next NJN anchor will certainly be a different process than what happens at the major networks, local affiliates and other public ... >
Tibet – the broad, high plateau between India and China – is bigger than Western Europe and the source of the great rivers of Asia: the Indus, ... >
For the past few weeks, I've watched with fascination as politician after politician have appeared on a beach or a boardwalk and declared their ... >
Check back tomorrow morning to view my sketchpad for day three of the Democratic National Convention, and go to my national blog to follow >
Some time ago, I analyzed the Catholic vote and noted in passing how some members of the Church hierarchy, in places such as St. Louis and Colorado ... >
Joey Novick from Politics Unusual spent the entire week live blogging from the Convention. Here are his daily posts, exclusive to PolitickerNJ.com. >
During a gubernatorial debate in 2005, then-U.S. Sen. Jon Corzine was asked if he supported lowering the drinking age to 18.
"I think it is ... >
Good Going Gov.
Jon Corzine did the right thing by allowing veteran State Employees who will not have 25 years of service by July 1st 2007 to enter wellness programs when they retire, which will save both the State and the retirees a good deal of money. Governor Corzine you took the high ground and when you do usually the snakes and rats will nip at your feet. Assemblyman Merkt and is ilk would not have said a word if you had given his rich patrons another tax cut, but you did the right thing. the Presidents of CWA Locals 1033 and 1034 did the right thing fighting for the reduction of these additional payments in their members retirement and should be commended also. Thank you Governor Corzine
Another outrage
In the private sector this would likely constitute an unfair labor practice. Collective bargaining is the forum for forging agreements. It's not supposed to be done on the sly, with no serious quid pro quo. The notion that the cost is inconsequential is a blatant lie. He references the impact solely on co-pays. What about the unfunded liabilities implicit in no-cost health care? That's the cost that's driving the big three automakers into bankruptcy. And, in the midst of that, our Governor says it's no big deal???? It's good to see Katz's "opposition" to the agreement--on just this point--has apparently been heard by the Governor, after the fact and with absolutely no reason. This is a disgrace and outrage and will certainly come back to haunt Corzine and state workers. taxpayers will voice outrage over actions such as this, in the face of confiscatory taxes in this State. One day soon we'll have a true statesman who runs the State in the same manner as companies under fiscal distress...because that's precisely what we have become, an organization in technical bankruptcy, in no small part thanks to the absurd unfunded liabilities from state employees' pensions and health care. And that's the fact!
unfunded liabilities
Your right it is an outrage, when Whitman (borrowed $2.9 billion to pay off an IRS debt to the Public employees pension fund made by her taking money from the fund and financing her tax cuts) and "McGreedy" balancing the budgets by not paying into those funds for over 10 years while the Public Employees paid $8.6 BILLION OF THEIR OWN MONEY IN THAT TIME PERIOD. Where was your outrage when that was going on. Most of those distressed companies that you speak of are paying outrageous and record breaking salaries and bonuses to top management while their employees are suffering, that is the outrage. Let me ask you this Jerseyred did you ever pay into your pension fund? Did you get a raise of 5% when inflation was 14% like we did in the late 70s or 80s, as we were trying to raise a family? Any benefit a retired Public Worker receives he or she paid for and earned many times over.
dadjag wrote..." Let me ask
dadjag wrote..." Let me ask you this Jerseyred did you ever pay into your pension fund?" Of course. I've paid into Social Security for 40+ years. The notion that public employees are bearing the cost of their pensions and health care is absurd. In years past, when public sector employees were paid less than peer private sector employees, richer benefits were justified as a partial gap-filler. Today, public sector employees are paid, on average, more than private sector employees. Yet, they continue to receive benefits that are more excessive and liberal than those provided virtually anyone in the private sector. It's absolutely untrue--but typical of the simple, class warfare used when the facts are against you--that salaries to management are anywhere near the cost of pensions and benefits. And, very soon, the State will need to report the true cost of these benefits...just as the private sector has done for years. Then everyone will see just what our officials and their Union comrades have done. They've pushed this State into a virtual state of bankruptcy. I', sure you know that the unfunded pension liability ALONE is over $60,000 per employee; for police and fire the unfunded liability is over $125,000 per employee. Use any of the old "us-versus-them" arguments that our poor-me public employees you want. The fact is that the end is near. These liabilities are coming to light very soon, and the uproar will be like nothing this State has ever seen. When everyone can see how New Jersey taxpayers have been taken for a ride by greedy and complicit "public servants", voters will sweep out the offenders like the duplicitous, self-dealing gangsters they are.