Romney supporters prepare for Feb. 5 primary fight

too bad the Giuliani people made the GOP primary all-or-nothing for delegates.

Now Giuliani will drop out, McCain will win, and Romney will get nothing in NJ.

Welcome to 2008, old man. 

Too bad.  The GOP has a chance to actually nominate someone who has written published, widely-read and highly regarded tracts on internnational finance and economics, and all these NJGOP leaders are discussing is which of the two remaining economic illiterates they should choose to lead them to their certain demise in November. 

About four (4) days before the Iowa Caucus, the Main Stream Media effectively buried the GOP's chances to win in November by ordering a media blackout of Dr. Ron Paul (except of course, to reiterate and republish some wholly baseless claims of racism against him).

Before the Michigan primary, Romney showed his prowess in the field of economics by promising to bring back jobs . . . long-gone jobs to Michigan with a severe, anti-free market program of government interventionism.  No sane person, based upon any cognizable theory of international trade and economics would make such a baseless pander-claim, much less an alleged free-marketeer.  Imagine what the Dem nominee's campaign will do with that one.

McCain on the other hand, and first to his credit, admitted that he had little familarity with finance and economics.  Of course, being a pathological liar, he thereafter denied he ever said such a thing.  More straight talk, I guess.  The media had a field day showing both statements on TV.  Imagine what the Dem nominee's campaign will do with that one.

There's a reason why the NJGOP is failing . . . they don't believe their own rhetoric and refuse to ever follow it when push comes to shove.  They invariably nominate BIG GOVERNMENT CONSERVATIVES (wha?).  Only one problem: the voting public can see through this . . . so they choose the consistent and truthful BIG GOVERMENT DEM over the disingenuous and duplicitous GOP BIG GOVERNMENT GOPer every time.

After all, given the choice, wouldn't you prefer to elect a truthful and sincere big government advocate over a lying, deceitful and dsihonest one?

Based upon my reading of some of the comments in here, I'm pretty sure that many of the commenters are political insiders.  We all pretty much live and breathe politics and/or law to a more or less degree.  So I've gotta believe that most of the people in here have been actively involved in either running for elective office and/or staffed a campaign.

Look at the timing of dropping Ron Paul down the media black hole.  The vast majority of primary voters don't pay much attention to the candidates until a few days before the actual primary election.  If no one hears about a candidate from the major media, then most primary voters will not vote for that candidate.  That candidate will likely get only soem true believers and political insiders who make up only a miniscule eprcentage of the primary voting total.

If you watched the GOP debates last night (and all the prior ones as well) Ron Paul got the fewest number of questions and the least amount of time to speak.  Former CIA associate, Anderson Cooper even cut Ron Paul off in midsentence when Ron Paul was making an important, if unconventional point.  Cooper then promised he would have a question for Ron Paul in a couple minutes.  But that didn't happen, of course.

What happened is a worthless, needless, contentless argument between McCain and Romney about "timetables".  It looked and sounded like the mock sessions we had as little children.  ("You hit me first . . . no I didn't", etc.)  Well, Cooper let this nonsense go on, wasting valuable time and leaving a complete non-issue unresolved.

The free media that dingbats like McCain and Romney get is worth millions and untold votes.  If the media had given Ron Paul the same or even slightly less coverage than those two woethess liberals, Ron Paul would have blown them away.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it . . .