U.S. Rep. Jim Saxton’s pending retirement has dramatically increased the likelihood of Democrats picking up the seat, according to Washington-based political analyst Stuart Rothenberg.
On Friday, after Saxton’s announcement, Rothenberg reclassified the status of the third district Congressional seat in his Political Report from “Republican favored,” the least vulnerable category for competitive races, to “pure toss-up,” the most vulnerable.
But that could all change depending on who the Republicans recruit to face off against state Sen. John Adler.
“We thought it was going to be a race. We were waiting to see what kind of campaign Adler ran and what the environment was going to be,” said Rothenberg. “It didn’t seem like the best of opportunities, but now it’s turned out to be what could be one of the dozen best opportunities in the country depending upon Republican recruiting.”
An open seat combined with what’s likely to be a hostile environment for Republicans could turn this narrowly Republican leaning district in Democrats’ favor. But, Rothenberg noted, if the Republicans pick a moderate candidate with high name recognition, they might still have an edge – depending on how hostile voters remain to the Republican Party.
“You would think that, all things being equal, the district would tilt slightly towards Republicans,” said Rothenberg. “So a Republican like Diane Allen might have an edge in the race. We’re waiting to see how bad an environment is for Republicans – is it mediocre bad or really bad?”
One of the classic stories of the New Jersey Legislature in 1968 were allegations that a Newark Assemblyman wanted to cancel a hearing on organized ... >
The Record announced yesterday that it was closing its Hackensack offices and "reinventing"itself. It was actually announcing its own ... >
NJ STARS, while failing in its intended purpose, nonetheless demonstrates the need for fundamental reform in NJ's high schools. >
Another fiscal-cutting measure still lies on the Governor's desk -- it's the one that reduces spending by way of statutory tweaks to the ... >
The 2009 New Jersey State Budget is not the stunning tribute to sound fiscal policy The Trenton insiders would have you believe, but just a ... >
The budget proposed by Gov. Jon Corzine has produced myriad negative reactions, featuring various interests seeking to limit the impact of the cuts ... >
Recently, I walked into a large movie theatre with my wife Barbara to see "Sex and the City," the long, long rendition of themes that ... >
As the Presidential election draws closer and closer, we tend to focus our attention on the daily horse race between the candidates and lose sight of ... >
not if Allen runs....
They can list it as a "pure toss-up" when there's no clear GOP candidate against Adler's money.....but once Diane Allen declares and becomes the front-runner, I really think it should be in the "leans GOP" column.
This is an uphill battle for Adler.
Democrats can win this seat,
Democrats can win this seat, Mr. Democrat, Allen or not.
Let's consider the respected Rothenberg's analysis, where he states that Adler v. Republican nominee to be "pure toss-up" and possibly "one of the dozen best opportunities in the country." Combine that with Washington Post political blogger Chris Cillizza, who contends that NJ-03 is "a swing district in an area of the country that has grown increasingly inhospitable to Republicans"; Cillizza, writer of The Fix, concludes that "this seat looks ripe for the taking." (Credit to Juan over at Blue Jersey for finding the WP article).
I'm waiting to hear what Sabato has to say about the seat; but again, reliable sources are claiming that this seat is a toss up and/or winnable for Adler. I tend to agree with their findings.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/11/new_jerseys_3rd_a_closer_look.html