March 15, 2007 - 9:45am
News

Senate retirements

At some level, the departure of so many state Senators this year probably will satisfy those who believe that too many politicians stay on for too long, thanks, of course, to the miracle of gerrymandering.

While there’s something to that argument, there’s also something to be said about experience and institutional memory. When veteran legislators like Joe Doria, Bill Gormley and Robert Littell pack it in, they take with them knowledge and savvy that often take years to develop.

Consider what happened across the Hudson River when voters imposed a two-term limit on members of the New York City Council. Dozens of legislators were turned out of office, and dozens of newcomers – some with no legislative experience – were brought in. The main beneficiaries were the Mayor, who, although also subject to term limits, had the power to steamroll the neophytes, and the Council’s staff members, who had to draw maps to the toilets for the new members.

Term limits helped sweep away some Councilmembers who hadn’t had an idea, good or bad, since the days of Abe Beame. But they also sent some pretty smart people, like Peter Vallone, into premature retirement. Term limits also have transformed the dynamics in New York’s City Council. As soon as a Councilmember wins a second term, he or she begins looking for a new job in government or in the private sector.

So much of real-life legislating involves knowing the players, knowing the process, and knowing the historic precedents for a particular bill or an issue. Sure, newcomers can learn, but there’s something to be said for the old political warhorses for whom the process is second nature.

Retirements are inevitable, and sometimes even welcome. But a wave of retirements can be unsettling, too.

 

TERRY GOLWAY can be reached via email at golway@politicsnj.com.
Related topics: Senate

Comments

longer term limits?


However Terry...not instituting term limits runs the risk of having Strom Thurmond types languish in office, where the staff makes all the decisions and the office-holder is largely a figure-head. Especially in the case of state legislators, where most voters don't even know who their legislator is, I think discouraging career politicians who are never challenged in their positions has some merit.

I agree that 2 terms is far too short for a legislator to build savvy and skills, but I think perhaps longer limits (10 years? 12 years?) would strike a fine balance.

03/15/07 2:10 pm

Fond Memories of New York Irrelevant


Term limits? These Senators did not leave because of term limits. They left for a variety of individual reasons. Come on, Terry, you have to get up to speed on New Jersey politics!

War stories about New York City Council politics don't cut it here.

As for the institutional memory bit, I'd say good riddance to the likes of Wayne Bryant whose institutional memory, going all the way back to the early 1990s, seems to have included finding schemes to steer public funds his own way. Even as an Assemblyman, for example, Wayne was found guilty by the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards for his disguised ownership role in a building owned by his law firm, Woodcrest Pavilion on Melrose Avenue in Cherry Hill.

The building was granted a sweetheart lease deal for state offices by the Florio Administration. And when it was exposed, first in the Trentonian, and then in other papers, the Administration cooked up all kinds of bogus stories about why the building was selected. But the real reason, as everyone knew, was the Lawnside rainmaker.  The joint committee thoroughly investigated the matter, and reached the right conclusion.  

by Trochilus

03/16/07 11:51 am