June 2, 2008 - 2:33pm

DeMicco wins Senate debate

There seems to be a general consensus among political insiders as to who won the Democratic U.S. Senate debate: Steve DeMicco.  Frank Lautenberg was less than impressive – not even close to his performance in previous debates against Millicent Fenwick, Pete Dawkins, Chuck Haytaian and Doug Forrester – but the debate was at 8PM on a Friday night, so it didn’t really matter.  That’s why DeMicco, Lautenberg’s consultant, was the winner – his campaign took quite a few hits for not engaging Rob Andrews in network TV debates, but it appears that was the right call.

Comments

Duh.


advising an 84-year old client to not engage one of the best debaters in the Congress? Where did he ever come up with such a brilliant strategy...

DeMicco gets credit for the obvious far too often. Like, it was sooo brilliant of him to spend $75 million of Jon Corzine's money too, I suppose...

06/02/08 3:05 pm

Seriously....


...how much does it cost to spell "overrated"?

06/02/08 3:27 pm

Yep.


Let's give credit to that blood sucker for keeping the tired old fossil off the air so no one will realize how old he is and why is age is an issue.

Yeah, he's a real genius.

Yep, fooling the public is genius. Keeping the incompetent in office is what he does best.

Why doesn't someone tell us how much money did they rape the Lautenberg campaign? How about that other annoying, whining consultant, Julie Roginsky? How much did she pull down repeating the same nonsense over and over again for two months?

These people are lower than lawyers if that's even possible.

06/02/08 8:07 pm