
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group that promotes ethics and accountability, has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that several candidates, including U.S. Rep. Rob Andrews, used $952.04 of campaign funds to buy clothing. The group filed a similar complaint against GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin in September.
“Sarah Palin wasn’t the only candidate to violate the law by using campaign money for clothing, several others did as well. Campaign finance laws are not optional, but if candidates can’t abide by these laws how can we trust them to be lawmakers?,” said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan. “There is no excuse for this conduct; the FEC should investigate these members and candidates immediately.”
CREW says that federal election law “specifically prohibits a candidate for federal office from converting campaign funds to personal use.”
"Because he had to dress for his speech immediately, he had to purchase an entirely new set of clothes," said Andrews aide Francis Tagmire in a statement. "The campaign credit card used to pay for the clothing was reimbursed in total by the airline, which wrote a check for $952.04 to the congressman on July 20, 2007. The congressman then endorsed the check over to the campaign account on July 20, 2007. Thus, the campaign incurred no expense for the clothing."
Chris Christie’s refusal to have his picture taken with Rick Merkt at a Republican event in Summit was probably just the former federal ... >
It's hard to not be concerned these days. We've all witnessed frustration with our institutions before but I never remember anything of this ... >
Instead of borrowing trillions to waste on make-work governmental projects, stimulate the economy with tax cuts. >
Score one for the Governor’s public relations team. For the last few weeks, they have been working overtime to fuel speculation Corzine was being ... >
With the entrance of Chris Christie into the Republican gubernatorial primary, the GOP has greatly enhanced its chances of capturing the ... >
Hard to believe we have arrived at the last year of the first decade of the 21st century. Boy, seems like it was just yesterday that Bush was handed ... >
It's actually come to this: A panel convened by the legislature of the State of New Jersey has concluded that discrimination is not good. Maybe ... >
As it tends to, history seems to be repeating itself as 240 laid-off workers at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago revive a decades old tactic -- ... >
Many columnists write a "year in review" or a "predictions" piece for the New Year, however I decided to refrain from going down ... >
Yesterday President-elect Barack Obama outlined his American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan in a speech at George Mason University. Obama said we ... >
Bogus
Seems to be a bogus accusation if the campaign was reimbursed. Maybe CREW should be fighting the harder battles with more vigor like the Charlie Rangel scandal.
My guess is that...
If CREW analyzed the campaign expenditures of every House and Senate member, there will be HUNDREDS OF EXAMPLES how these idiots are all spending campaign money on personal items.
I always found it strange that for someone who earns $175,000 a year, they all dress like they fell out of a Bloomingdale's catalogue.
Why doesn't CREW go look at the expenditures of some high profile Democrats in the leadership and Republicans as well...
"Fashion" gate wouldn't be too far behind.
Vote Column "A" - All the way!
Is there something missing?
This is crappy "journalism." The group makes a sexy charge. The campaign offers a very reasonable explanation. Still the sexy charge gets the headline and the first three paragraphs, and the plausible explanation gets tacked onto the very end.