Taxpayers are ready for a conservative Republican message committed to reducing big government. The state’s bloated budget can be reduced by a conservative legislative majority committed to achieving fiscal stability and implementing fundamental change. The promise of Republicans should not be to make government “more efficient�-- that translates into taking taxpayer dollars faster and spending them quicker, but rather to reduce its size. It is essential to determine just what government should be doing and return all functions feasible to the private sector. In short-downsize, prioritize and privatize.
Downsizing starts with the general appropriation budget, rampant with billions in pork barrel spending programs. Republicans must draw a line in the sand. Regardless of whatever “grant “is inserted in the budget for their district, Republicans must put all taxpayers ahead of special interests. Only when Republicans stand tall and do not sell out for some cheap “grant “can they begin to rebuild the confidence of taxpayers.
Opposing non-essential programs would save billions. Republicans should point out that operating budgets for every department are inflated as every department of the state government is overstaffed. They should call on every department head to be required to reduce their budgets a minimum 10%. If incapable, they should demand new managers.
Privatization will cut costs dramatically. Bookkeeping, maintenance and a host of functions can be bid on a competitive basis. Privatization also takes people out of the pension system and eliminates sick and vacation days. This means layoffs-which takes guts.
New Jersey has one of the most lucrative pension systems in the country. The Republicans should call for a roll back in the pension increases granted in 2001 when union bosses claimed the fund was solvent. Taxpayers are subsidizing the pension system through direct taxation. New employees should be placed in private 401(k) plans. This ends the stagnation that occurs when employees remain to build their pension well after they are productive. This is a key reason for Trenton’s large entrenched bureaucracy.
Republicans can lead the move to bring the states medical benefits in line with the private sector. Even Governor Jon Corzine realized this before being caught up in the Trenton mentality. We provide the finest medical benefits available while requiring little or no employee contribution. Health Savings Accounts are a cost saving alternative while benefiting the employee. It is common in the private sector to require employees to contribute when adding a spouse to their coverage.
For Republicans to effect these sweeping changes requires breaking the hold of powerful labor unions. union leaders continue to call for more spending and higher taxes. We have seen the unions’ effect on many of the nation’s manufacturing industries, rendering them unable to compete in a world economy.
Project Labor Agreements, Jim McGreevey Executive Order #1, have driven up costs of local and state projects an average of 30%. Republicans must call for PLA’s to be repealed and there must be union givebacks.
The biggest obstacle to implementing change is the legislature itself. Legislators are vested in the state’s pension and medical benefits program. What is often a lifetime position in the legislature is a significant part of the problem and therefore cannot be the solution. Our legislature is almost always in session, constantly imagining ways to borrow and spend. Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said “no one is safe when the legislature is in session�. Correcting this problem requires implementing term limits, removing legislators from the state pension and medical benefits programs and returning to part time citizen legislators. This requires a majority willing to force these changes.
These steps are difficult but necessary. Since 2001, NJ has added over 50,000 new government jobs while the private sector has remained stagnant. In 2005 almost 57,000 residents fled the state. We have had the fastest growing tax burden in the nation since 2002, and as other states are building surpluses we are creating deficits.
It is obvious the Democrats vision for New Jersey is for more big government that is clear in the current budget proposal, and higher taxes. Republicans have the opportunity to offer a better vision. Smaller government, lower taxes, less government regulations and greater prosperity. Or they can accept the status quo and the crumbs that might be thrown their way.
Come on, Republicans, strap on the armor. New Jersey taxpayers are hankering for a fight. The time is now.
One of the classic stories of the New Jersey Legislature in 1968 were allegations that a Newark Assemblyman wanted to cancel a hearing on organized ... >
The Record announced yesterday that it was closing its Hackensack offices and "reinventing"itself. It was actually announcing its own ... >
NJ STARS, while failing in its intended purpose, nonetheless demonstrates the need for fundamental reform in NJ's high schools. >
Another fiscal-cutting measure still lies on the Governor's desk -- it's the one that reduces spending by way of statutory tweaks to the ... >
The 2009 New Jersey State Budget is not the stunning tribute to sound fiscal policy The Trenton insiders would have you believe, but just a ... >
The budget proposed by Gov. Jon Corzine has produced myriad negative reactions, featuring various interests seeking to limit the impact of the cuts ... >
Recently, I walked into a large movie theatre with my wife Barbara to see "Sex and the City," the long, long rendition of themes that ... >
As the Presidential election draws closer and closer, we tend to focus our attention on the daily horse race between the candidates and lose sight of ... >
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
"Taxpayers are ready for a conservative Republican message committed to reducing big government."
You just keep repeating that to yourself, Steverino. Then click your heels three times. T
axpayers want to pay lower taxes, but they also want government services. You tell them you are cutting parks, reducing recreation, ending after school programs and banning swimming at Round Valley and they will take your head off. But it's going to lower taxes! you'll respond.
At the same time they save their $150 in taxes from those cuts they will then have to pay $500 for what they lost on the open market.
I don't debate that government needs a top to bottom review, but you anti-tax folks keep saying your message is a good sell and then grow the federal budget and deficit to incredible amounts, and grow government prescription benefits in order to keep control.
Change isn't easy
While most taxpayers cringe at the thought of services being cut, they also realize that New Jersey cannot keep going down the same road of gimmicks and quick fixes like Jon Corzine's latest rebate scheme. All they do in the long run is dig us into a bigger hole.
All too often, people want to have their cake and eat it too. That being said, you'll often find the majority of those people are realists who see that if we keep going in the direction we're going, they're not going to be able to afford to live here anymore. Is having effective services worth that much? It's the equivalent of defending Benito Mussolini because "he made the trains run on time".
Furthermore, who else besides those who live in New Jersey's urban and inner city areas get to enjoy most of these services? The overwhelming bulk of these taxpayer dollars get unfairly redistributed to areas that already get large amounts of state aid so the majority of taxpayers don't even get to see the fruits of their labors. Fiscal conservatism works wherever you implement it, even in an inner city like Jersey City where prior to Bret Schundler becoming Mayor, taxes were so bad that people were abandoning there homes and filing default on there taxes. Unfortunately, it often takes that kind of wake-up call for us to get it and New Jersey is coming dangerously close.
It's like Theodore Roosevelt once said, "Americans often learn from catastrophe and never from experience."
PAY YOUR OWN WAY
If it is not an essential service, you should pay your own way. A visit to the park should be paid by those who use the area. An after school program should be paid for by the parents. We could cut NJ government in half, save the tax money, and use it to pay our own way. Do you like big government micro-managing your life with your own money? Soon the only ones left in this sinking state will be public workers. Then those who were able to escape will sit back and watch all the public workers support each other.
MAYBE WE NEED A THIRD WAY
I agree with most of what has been written here, but I doubt the GOP is up to the task. Too many of them are just plain politicians, as are the Dems. I'm starting to think we need a Third Party to shake things up. Either an exisitng one like the NJ Conservative Party, or some new movement. Even if they could not do it all themselves it would present a choice and a threat to the establishment. They could work with members of either of the two major parties who might be brave enough to fight for real change.